| The Surgical Technologist | JULY 2022 300
Edited by: Philip Frank Stahel, Rocky Vista University, United States Reviewed by: Robert W. Cross, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States Paolo Bernante, University of Bologna, Italy *Correspondence: Mark M. Walsh [email protected] †Deceased Speciality section: This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery Received: 04 March 2022 Accepted: 05 April 2022 Published: 04 May 2022 Citation: Bunch CM, Moore EE, Moore HB, Neal MD, Thomas AV, Zackariya N, Zhao J, Zackariya S, Brenner TJ, Berquist M, Buckner H, Wiarda G, Fulkerson D, Huff W, Kwaan HC, Lankowicz G, Laubscher GJ, Lourens PJ, Pretorius E, Kotze MJ, Moolla MS, Sithole S, Maponga TG, Kell DB, Fox MD, Gillespie L, Khan RZ, Mamczak CN, March R, Macias R, Bull BS and Walsh MM (2022) Immuno-Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19: Implications for Timing of Surgery and Anticoagulation. Front. Surg. 9:889999. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.889999 Immuno-Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19: Implications for Timing of Surgery and Anticoagulation Connor M. Bunch1, Ernest E. Moore2, Hunter B. Moore2, Matthew D. Neal3, Anthony V. Thomas4, Nuha Zackariya4, Jonathan Zhao5, Sufyan Zackariya5, Toby J. Brenner5, Margaret Berquist5, Hallie Buckner5, Grant Wiarda5, Daniel Fulkerson4,6, Wei Huff4,6, Hau C. Kwaan7, Genevieve Lankowicz5, Gert J. Laubscher8, Petrus J. Lourens8, Etheresia Pretorius9,13, Maritha J. Kotze10, Muhammad S. Moolla11, Sithembiso Sithole11, Tongai G. Maponga12, Douglas B. Kell9,13,14, Mark D. Fox4, Laura Gillespie15, Rashid Z. Khan16, Christiaan N. Mamczak4,17, Robert March18, Rachel Macias4,19, Brian S. Bull20† and Mark M. Walsh4,5* 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States, 2Department of Surgery, Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, CO, United States, 3Pittsburgh Trauma Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 4Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend Campus, Notre Dame, IN, United States, 5Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States, 6Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States, 7Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 8Mediclinic Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 9Department of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 10Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, 11Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, 12Division of Medical Virology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, 13Department of Biochemistry and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 14The Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, 15Department of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States, 16Department of Hematology, Michiana Hematology Oncology, Mishawaka, IN, United States, 17Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Memorial Hospital South Bend, South Bend, IN, United States, 18Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States, 19Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States, 20Department of Pathology and Human Anatomy, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, United States Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, global governing bodies prioritized transmissibility-based precautions and hospital capacity as the foundation for delay of elective procedures. As elective surgical volumes increased, convalescent COVID-19 patients faced increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and clinicians had limited evidence for stratifying individual risk in this population. Clear evidence now demonstrates that those recovering from COVID-19 have increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. These data— in conjunction with the recent American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines—offer the evidence necessary to expand the early pandemic guidelines and guide the surgeon’s preoperative risk assessment. Here, we argue elective surgeries should still be delayed on a personalized basis to maximize postoperative outcomes. We outline a framework for stratifying the individual COVID-19 patient’s fitness for surgery based on the symptoms and severity of acute or convalescent COVID-19 illness, coagulopathy assessment, and acuity of the surgical REVIEW published: 04 May 2022 doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.889999 Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 1 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999 JULY 2022 | The Surgical Technologist | 301 Immuno-Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19: Implications for Timing of Surgery and Anticoagulation
procedure. Although the most common manifestation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is COVID-19 pneumonitis, every system in the body is potentially afflicted by an endotheliitis. This endothelial derangement most often manifests as a hypercoagulable state on admission with associated occult and symptomatic venous and arterial thromboembolisms. The delicate balance between hyper and hypocoagulable states is defined by the local immune-thrombotic crosstalk that results commonly in a hemostatic derangement known as fibrinolytic shutdown. In tandem, the hemostatic derangements that occur during acute COVID-19 infection affect not only the timing of surgical procedures, but also the incidence of postoperative hemostatic complications related to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC). Traditional methods of thromboprophylaxis and treatment of thromboses after surgery require a tailored approach guided by an understanding of the pathophysiologic underpinnings of the COVID-19 patient. Likewise, a prolonged period of risk for developing hemostatic complications following hospitalization due to COVID-19 has resulted in guidelines from differing societies that recommend varying periods of delay following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In conclusion, we propose the perioperative, personalized assessment of COVID-19 patients’ CAC using viscoelastic hemostatic assays and fluorescent microclot analysis. Keywords: COVID-19, elective surgical procedure, immunothrombosis, obstetrics, orthopedic procedures, venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, fibrinolysis INTRODUCTION: PERIOPERATIVE COVID19 AND POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical procedures was unprecedented (1, 2). After the induction of the national state of emergency in the United States in March 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the American College of Surgeons (ACS), and other international surgical societies recommended postponing, minimizing, and cancelling elective surgical procedures based largely on SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility precautions (3–5). During this time, there was a 50% reduction in the number of surgical procedures performed relative to baseline (1). Five weeks later, a joint recommendation was published that advised the resumption of elective surgical procedures (6). As the demand for elective procedures increased, clinicians were faced with a growing number of patients still recovering from COVID-19, and surgeons had little available evidence for the optimal timing of surgery and postoperative prognosis for those recovering from acute and/or convalescent COVID-19 illness (7). As the pandemic continued and data accrued, postoperative morbidity and mortality were confirmed to be significantly higher for patients with perioperative COVID-19 infection (8). Perioperative COVID-19 infection correlated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications and venous thromboemboli (VTE) (e.g., pulmonary emboli [PE] and deep venous thromboses [DVT]) (9). Notably, those with ongoing symptoms at the time of operation—regardless of length from diagnosis/onset of COVID-19 symptoms—have a significantly greater risk of VTE and associated mortality. VTE has been independently associated with 30-day postoperative mortality (odds ratio 5.4 [95%CI 4.3–6.7]) (9). One prospective cohort study by the COVIDSurg Collaborative evaluated >140,000 surgical patients from 116 countries who underwent elective or emergency surgery during October 2020 (10). Surgical patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared to those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was a significant increase in postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality in patients with a recent diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (10). The calculated 30-day mortality rates were stratified by time between diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and surgery (groups included those diagnosed 0–2, 3–4, 5–6, and ≥7 weeks prior to surgery). For those patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection, the adjusted 30-day mortality rate was 1.5%. For those patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 30-day postoperative mortality rates were 9.1% for 0–2 weeks; 6.9% for 3–4 weeks; 5.5% for 5–6 weeks; and 2.0% at ≥7 weeks between diagnosis and surgery. Surgery performed ≥7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline for controls (odds ratio 1.5 [95%CI 0.9–2.1]). Further stratifying this analysis to those patients with ongoing symptoms at time of surgery, it was noted that even after a ≥7 week delay from SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis, these symptomatic convalescent patients had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic at operation (6.0% for ongoing symptoms, vs. 2.4% for resolved symptoms, vs. 1.3% for controls). Consequently, the authors recommended that surgery be delayed for at least seven weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and concluded that patients with ongoing symptoms at seven weeks may benefit from even longer delay (10). A recent multidisciplinary consensus statement aligned with these study conclusions, stating that elective surgery should be scheduled seven or more weeks after the diagnosis of COVID19 for patients with asymptomatic or transient SARS-CoV-2 infection, while patients with persistent symptoms (i.e., “Long COVID”) remain at elevated risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality even after seven weeks. It is therefore Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 2 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999 | The Surgical Technologist | JULY 2022 302
recommended to stratify patient risk in delaying surgery beyond seven weeks on a personalized basis (11). In one systematic review including >250,000 patients, more than half had post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 at six months follow-up (12). Clearly, there is a significant need to risk stratify this patient population on an individualized basis. The most recent American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) joint recommendation for the delay of surgery have been divided into four blocks of time based upon the symptoms and severity of acute COVID-19 illness: • “Four weeks for an asymptomatic patient or recovery from only mild, non-respiratory symptoms • Six weeks for a symptomatic patient (e.g., cough, dyspnea) who did not require hospitalization • Eight to 10 weeks for a symptomatic patient who is diabetic, immunocompromised, or hospitalized • Twelve weeks for a patient who was admitted to an intensive care unit due to COVID-19 infection” The ASA and APSF joint recommendation further states: “These timelines should not be considered definitive; each patient’s preoperative risk assessment should be individualized, factoring in surgical intensity, patient co-morbidities, and the benefit/risk ratio of further delaying surgery” (13). Specifically, these recommendations have not considered the differing degrees of coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 variants. Additionally, there is little guidance on elective surgery for patients afflicted with Long COVID, and there are few proposals for preoperative laboratory measurements (e.g., D-dimer, fibrinogen, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and other clinical and laboratory markers of severity of disease) to guide surgeons and anesthesiologists for the appropriate timing of surgery (14, 15). Likewise, sparse guidance exists for the postoperative thromboprophylaxis of this patient group. In a large study of 11,249 patients from the first COVID-19 surge in the Spring of 2020 in New York City, 1.7% of all patients discharged from the hospital had VTE or arterial thromboembolism (16). This study also reported that prophylactic anticoagulation with either enoxaparin or rivaroxaban engenders a 46% reduction in clotting disorders (16). However, the unique pathophysiological aspect of COVID-19 pneumonitis is that these patients may bleed and clot at the same time when anticoagulated (17). It was reported that 1.73% of discharged patients suffered major bleeding within 90 days of discharge while only 13.2% of the entire cohort was administered thromboprophylaxis (16). Together these findings offer surgeons the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the unique hemostatic derangement of CAC affecting postoperative outcomes worldwide. A basic flow chart for triaging acute and convalescent COVID-19 patients based upon recent ASA and surgical guidelines for the timing of surgery and postoperative VTE prophylaxis is presented in Figure 1. Clear data demonstrates unvaccinated individuals with COVID infection procure a higher risk of thrombosis and more severe illness. Breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals have less thrombotic risk and lower risk of severe illness (27). Following the ASA guidelines, patients’ length of delay for surgery should be based on the severity of illness regardless of vaccination status. The impact of COVID-19 on immune system-related complications in surgical patients is a crosstalk between immunology and coagulation at the level of the endothelium. This is more than a theoretical concept; rather, it is an important pathophysiologic understanding of the unique challenges of operating on patients who have either recent or remote infections with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Few guidelines exist concerning the timing and nature of this dual threat of bleeding and clotting that occur in a surgical patient with COVID-19 (28, 29). This review will address the pathophysiologic underpinnings of COVID-19 as it relates to surgical timing and thromboprophylaxis, followed by a specific application of these immune-thrombotic changes to perioperative and postoperative management of patients. COVID-19-ASSOCIATED COAGULOPATHY (CAC) Recent consensus and guidelines exist, but they lack granularity to assist the surgeon for optimizing the timing of elective surgery and guiding postoperative thromboprophylaxis for their individual convalescent COVID-19 patients. The longterm effects of COVID-19 infection are still under investigation. Hence, there are limited studies or specific guidelines aiding the surgeon in weighing risks and benefits of elective surgery for patients post-recovery from COVID-19. Persistent complications of COVID-19 infection after recovery are a product of the vast endothelial damage induced by SARS-CoV-2 (29). It is pertinent for the surgeon and anesthesiologist to understand the mechanisms of this endotheliitis to individualize care for their convalescent COVID-19 patients in this time of limited evidence-based guidance. Pathophysiology of CAC: A Labile Balance Between Fibrinolysis and Fibrinolytic Shutdown Immuno-thrombosis is often described as the dysregulated interaction between innate immunity and coagulation (30–32). A reported 30-80% of COVID-19 ICU patients endure thrombotic complications during their clinical course (33–36). The most common thrombotic complication in COVID-19 patients is VTE, which occurs in 15-85% of patients (37). Although the exact mechanism behind CAC is poorly understood, endotheliitis likely incites the hypercoagulable state (Figure 2) (38–42). The SARS-CoV-2 virus directly invades endothelial cells through the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. This leads to localization of viral inclusion bodies in the lungs, liver, small intestines, and kidneys, shedding of endothelial glycocalyx proteins, and decreases in the level of heparanase-2. This results in a Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 3 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999 JULY 2022 | The Surgical Technologist | 303
| The Surgical Technologist | JULY 2022 304 FIGURE 1 | COVID-19 patient surgical fitness flow chart. The surgeon assesses the acuity of the procedure using the specialty-specific Elective Surgery Acuity Scale (ESAS). If the procedure is of low/intermediate acuity and can be delayed, the length of delay may follow American Society of Anesthesiologists’ recommendations. After the delay, timing of surgery is a function of both the necessity of surgery and the degree of recovery of respiratory and hemostatic derangement post-COVID-19. Post-operatively, due to a high degree of hypercoagulability in many convalescent COVID-19 patients, standard pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis may be considered in all these patients. Created using BioRender.com. *Cardiorespiratory symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, and fatigue are common in patients with convalescent COVID-19 (12, 13, 18, 19). Coagulopathy, including both hyper and hypocoagulable states, should be assessed pre- and post-operatively using fibrinogen levels, platelet count, and viscoelastic hemostatic assays (e.g., thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)). The definition of hyper and hypocoagulability are a function of institutional preference. **This is not an exhaustive list of anticoagulant agents, nor a comprehensive dosing regimen. For inpatients acutely ill with COVID-19, those with VTE, those who undergo emergent surgery, or those at risk for hemorrhage, personalized titration of anticoagulation with adjunctive viscoelastic hemostatic assays is recommended (17, 20–23). VTE prophylaxis for postoperative patients with acute or convalescent COVID-19 is not specifically addressed in recent expert consensus statements or society recommendations (24–26). As such, this recommendation is the opinion of the authors and should be judiciously applied taking into account each individual patient’s risk and benefit to anticoagulant therapy. Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 4 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
JULY 2022 | The Surgical Technologist | 305 FIGURE 2 | COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) and Fibrinolytic Shutdown. (1) The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein binds with angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which causes internalization of the receptor and virus into the host cell. (2) In turn, ACE2 is not available for breakdown of angiotensin II (AT-II) leading to its build-up. AT-II causes subsequent lung injury and increases in plasminogen activated inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). Angiotensin I-7 (AT-I-7) and angiotensin I-9 (AT-I-9) are increased by other pathways involving activated platelets, but also lead to increased levels of PAI-1. (3) Increased circulating PAI-1 leads to fibrinolytic shutdown, a hypercoagulable state characterized by increased fibrin deposition and thrombus formation. (4) Among other mechanisms, widespread endotheliitis and microthrombosis can cause multi-organ injury in patients with severe COVID-19 illness. This exacerbates the acute inflammatory response, often causing a cytokine storm and worsening immuno-thrombosis. Inflammatory cytokines activate Factor XII (FXII), which subsequently increases bradykinin levels. Bradykinin increases tissue plasminogen activator (tPa) levels. (5) This subacute rebalancing of the fibrinolytic system predisposes the COVID-19 patient to both thrombosis and hemorrhage as a function of local endothelial derangement. This is particularly the case for hospitalized COVID-19 patients who are anticoagulated; these patients’ anticoagulant regimen must be judiciously titrated on a personalized basis (17, 29, 31). The spectrum of fibrinolysis is depicted as a balance whereby the predominate hypercoagulable fibrinolytic shutdown phenotype is portrayed as a balance with high levels of PAI-1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), fibrinogen, D-dimer, and lower levels of tPa and plasmin. The opposite occurs at the opposite end of the fibrinolysis spectrum when fibrinolysis predominates, which occurs much less frequently in CAC. Created using BioRender.com Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 5 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
| The Surgical Technologist | APRIL 2022 306 JUNE 202 306 progression from normal hemostasis to a relatively antifibrinolytic state (31, 38, 43–45). The SARS-CoV-2 viral saturation of ACE2 increases circulating levels of angiotensin II, leading to increased production of the important antifibrinolytic mediator, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) (46–48). Elevated PAI-1 and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) levels in the alveolar space have been identified in COVID-19 patients (46, 49–51). Elevated tissue plasminogen activator (tPa) levels have also been noted in COVID-19 patients. This tPa release may be due to malperfusion secondary to microvascular fibrin deposition. Despite this increase in tPa, pro-thrombosis persists in these patients, suggesting that elevated PAI-1 and TAFI overwhelm the action of tPa, resulting in microvascular deposition of fibrin (52). These factors contribute to the disruption of the tightly regulated balance between thrombosis and fibrinolysis in COVID-19 patients, leading to what is known as “fibrinolytic shutdown” (17, 46, 50, 52–58). When combined with elevated thrombin generation, it leads to adverse complications such as a type of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multisystem organ failure, and mortality (29, 59–62). This unique type of ARDS is often associated with a localized hypercoagulability of the pulmonary vasculature due to abnormal deposition of fibrin and development of microthrombosis (63–66). Postmortem analyses confirm a similar presentation in patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS (67–70). This localized hypercoagulability is partially induced by inflammation of tissue, leading to elevated tissue factor (TF) production by epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages which results in the deposition of fibrin and the development of microthrombosis (46, 71). Thromboses are additionally potentiated by a deficient fibrinolytic response primarily induced by the overexpression of PAI-1 from activated platelets and endothelial cells (31, 72, 73). Primary hemostasis, which is accomplished via activated platelets at the site of endothelial injury, contributes to the hypercoagulable state of the COVID-19 patient. Overwhelming platelet activation is driven by many stimuli, and significantly facilitated by increased levels of von Willebrand Factor (VWF), as well as activation of the enzymatic (intrinsic) clotting pathway. COVID-19 patients have increased activation of circulating platelets as demonstrated by elevated soluble P-selectin as well as markers for endothelial activation (74). A direct stimulatory role of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on the COVID-19 patient’s platelets has also been described (75). Severe COVID-19 illness correlates not just with platelet activation but is also associated with enhanced platelet-monocyte aggregation. Finally, ICU admitted COVID-19 patients’ platelets induce Pselectin and αIIb/β3-dependent monocyte TF expression which may augment inflammation and hypercoagulability (76). Together, these aberrancies in hemostasis mediated by platelets and reduced fibrinolysis (documented by whole blood viscoelastic hemostatic assays [VHAs], thromboelastography [TEG] and rotational thromboelastometry [ROTEM]) inevitably lead to uncontrollable hypercoagulopathy (76–78). The TEG/ROTEM evaluates the patient’s position along the hemostatic spectrum from hypo to hypercoagulable states. The tracings resemble a shovel, whereby the length of the handle reflects coagulation factor competence, the slope of the blade reflects fibrinogen concentration, the thickness of the blade reflects clot contraction mediated by fibrin-platelet interaction, and the tapering end of the blade represents fibrinolysis. Therefore, a characteristic early COVID-19 patient with a hypercoagulable state presents with a short handle, a steep slope, and a thick blade with no tapering of the blade, which represents enhanced effect of coagulation factors, increased fibrinogen concentration, increased fibrin/platelet function, and fibrinolytic shutdown. At the other end of the spectrum lies the hypocoagulable state as manifested by a long handle, flat slope, thin blade, with significant tapering. In Figure 3, examples of this paradigm are represented along various stages of this spectrum of coagulopathies associated with COVID-19. The hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients is clearly complex and multifactorial, but understanding these complex mechanisms allows for the pursuit of specific treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. Management is complicated because of fibrinolytic shutdown due to the reduction of natural fibrinolysis at the level of the endothelium. While a multitude of studies have shown the detrimental effect of fibrinolytic shutdown on COVID-19 patient outcomes, bleeding complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke are also common, especially in patients on therapeutic anticoagulation (17, 79, 80, 82–86). These patients tend to clot and bleed at the same time, a function of the “rollercoaster” phenomenon (77). Timing of Elective Surgery for Acute and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients Even for those patients without comorbidities or illness requiring hospitalization, a large number of convalescent COVID-19 patients at four months post-infection are reported to have one or more residual organ system impairments as defined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1 mapping (12, 87). This phenomenon is termed Long COVID (or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 [PASC]) and can involve any organ system (88). Hypercoagulability and VTE have been described as potential complications in Long COVID patients (88). In the convalescent COVID-19 patient, it is important to understand that the timing of surgery is a function of where the patient lies within the context of their individual immuno-thrombotic state (77). Further research is necessary for determining potential biomarkers which may allow surgeons to weigh the risks and benefits of elective surgery. Multiple studies have shown persistently elevated D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- α, interferon (IFN)-γ-induced protein 10, factor VIII, VWF, and plasma soluble thrombomodulin in patients up to six months post-recovery from COVID-19 (81, 89–94), indicating that these may serve as potential biomarkers Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 6 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
JULY 2022 | The Surgical Technologist | 307 for assessing the risk of postoperative complications. Hypercoagulability markers are often associated with postoperative complications in non-COVID-19 perioperative settings (e.g., PAI-1, TAFI, increased fibrinogen and platelet counts) (7, 95–97). Research on these and other biomarkers in assessing postoperative morbidity and mortality in convalescent COVID-19 patients undergoing elective surgery, however, is lacking. Future studies are required in order to determine the most prognostic biomarkers for evaluating this patient population (88). Treatment and Thromboprophylaxis for the Postoperative COVID-19 Patient COVID-19 and the subsequent damage to endothelial cells result in a progression from hemostasis to a relatively prothrombotic/ antifibrinolytic state (31, 38, 43–45). Clinical data demonstrate significant thrombophilia with fibrinolysis shutdown being a primary component, regulated by higher circulating levels of antifibrinolytic factors, namely PAI-1 and TAFI. Yet, coagulation is a rigorously regulated process: fibrinolytic and thrombotic pathways are continuously competing against each other such that neither hemorrhage nor thrombosis is favored under normal physiological conditions (98). Therapeutic strategies for COVID-19 patients that utilize these findings, including the use of fibrinolytics, have been under examination and show potential for improving patient outcomes. For patients being treated with COVID-19, therapeutic anticoagulation is the standard regimen for patients with macrothrombosis. Furthermore, the use of anticoagulant heparinoids is advised for all COVID-19 patients (99). The use of tPa has been suggested for patients with severe ARDS caused by COVID-19 (100). In these studies, the use has been late in the disease course. Theoretically, if tPa is used earlier FIGURE 3 | The “rollercoaster” phenomenon of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. The three stages of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and their relationship to the immuno-thrombotic derangement caused by the cytokine storm are represented above by viscoelastic hemostatic assays (e.g., thromboelastography [TEG]). (A) represents the acute fibrinolytic shutdown phenotype (short R, steep α, thick MA, no lysis). (B) represents the eventual evolution to a normal physiologic fibrinolytic phenotype (normal R, α, MA, and LY30). (C) represents the TEG in evolution without anticoagulation and the subacute recovery stage where the patient is less hypercoagulable (parameters intermediate between acute and remote). (D) represents the patient with or without anticoagulant with a hypocoagulopathic phenotype due to hypofibrinogenemia and/or a thrombocytopenia in spite of persistent fibrinolytic shutdown (long R, flat α, narrow MA, no lysis) (17, 20, 77, 79–81). Created using Adobe Illustrator. Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 7 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
| The Surgical Technologist | JULY 2022 308 during the hypercoagulable stages of the disease, the fibrinolytic and therapeutic effect may be greater than those reported in the recent literature. Also, when administered later in the course of the disease—as the cytokine storm recedes—the patients may be prone to hemorrhage similar to anticoagulated COVID-19 patients (17, 101). Therapeutic anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis for the hospitalized COVID-19 surgical patient vary substantially. Recommendations have been made from adherence to standard VTE prophylactic guidance to intermediate or therapeutic dosing for moderately ill COVID-19 patients (85, 86). The preferred agents have been enoxaparin with antiXa monitoring or unfractionated heparin with either activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or anti-Xa guidance. This heterogeneity is based on large multiplatform randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as well as society consensus statements. Recent guidelines and consensus statements have considered conditional support for therapeutic and/or intermediate heparinoid thromboprophylaxis for moderately ill COVID-19 patients not requiring high-flow oxygen (Table 1) (24–26, 85, 86, 99, 102–104). The importance of this foundational literature has been highlighted by observations that clinicians find it difficult to practice medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic bereft of RCTs to guide treatment (105). Therefore, reliance on categorization of hemostatic phenotype by VHAs fulfills the criteria of personalized-based medicine as a guidance for anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis for the COVID-19 surgical patient. For elective cases, a high incidence of patients discharged from the hospital have VTEs within 90 days of discharge from COVID-19 (16). In addition, a subsection of the population who have COVID-19 and have undergone surgery have a markedly elevated rate of VTEs (9). Because of the absence of specific RCTs recommending postoperative DVT prophylaxis in this group of patients, use of Elective Surgery Acuity Scale (ESAS) guidelines as well as co-morbidities and adjunctive VHA analysis would allow for postoperative DVT prophylaxis similar to that which has been recommended for the postCOVID discharged patient. Specifically, the recommendations vary from 10 mg rivaroxaban for 35 days, 2.5 mg apixaban b.i.d. for 35 days, or for patients with normal renal function, 40 mg enoxaparin for 35 days (102, 106, 107). Specific comorbid analysis using conventional coagulation tests with adjunctive TEG-guided anticoagulation for COVID-19 patients with and without macrothrombosis has demonstrated the ability of the TEG to assist in the prediction of bleeding and clotting in this group of patients (17, 108). Similarly, the large RCTs which have demonstrated therapeutic benefit of heparinoids in moderately ill COVID-19 patients would be refined by the addition of VHAs to guide anticoagulant therapy (17, 85, 86, 109). As has been shown, so-called “intermediate” and therapeutic anticoagulation has been found to protect patients with moderately severe COVID-19 pneumonitis (86). Surgeons will find themselves during the acute and subacute period considering emergent and semi-emergent procedures for patients on anticoagulation not just for known macrothromboses but also for the specific antiviral and antiinflammatory functions of heparinoids in these patients (85, 86, 109). In addition to conventional coagulation tests, anticoagulation for these patients is facilitated by adjunctive hemostatic monitoring with VHAs (17, 20–22). The sequelae of Long COVID may be a function of residual endothelial damage from the SARS-CoV-2 endothelial cell invasion (88, 110). As such, thromboprophylaxis for postoperative convalescent COVID-19 patients should draw from strategies to manage acute COVID-19 patients along with the strategies for non-COVID-19 patients undergoing elective surgery. Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays and Plasma Fluorescent Microclot Analysis as Precision-based Tools to Contextualize COVID-19-associated Immuno-thrombosis Surgeons—because of their more than half century experience with TEG/ROTEM to diagnose and treat coagulopathies in liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, and trauma—have been TABLE 1 | Salient society recommendations on anticoagulant dosing for acute COVID-19 patients. Society Outpatient Inpatient Intensive Care Unit Post-discharge American Society of Hematology (February 2, 2022) (24) Thromboprophylaxis not recommended For patients without VTE, standard prophylactic dose with LMWH or UFH For patients without VTE, standard prophylactic dose with LMWH or UFH Thromboprophylaxis not recommended American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline (February 12, 2022) (25) Not addressed Conditional recommendation: For patients without VTE, therapeutic dose with LMWH or UFH For patients without VTE, standard prophylactic dose with LMWH or UFH Not addressed National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines (February 24, 2022) (26) Not addressed Therapeutic dose heparin only for patients hospitalized on low-flow oxygen For hospitalized patients without VTE and not requiring oxygen or requiring high-flow device or NIV, standard prophylactic dose with LMWH or UFH For patients without VTE, standard prophylactic dose with LMWH or UFH Thromboprophylaxis not recommended Abbreviations: LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; UFH, unfractionated heparin; VTE, venous thromboembolism. Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 8 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
JULY 2022 | The Surgical Technologist | 309 at the forefront of pathophysiologic investigations of CAC (111). Because of surgeons’ historical experience on the intricacies of hemostasis, surgeons have employed TEG/ROTEM to guide and personalize anticoagulation during the COVID-19 pandemic (20–22, 28, 29, 101, 112). TEG/ROTEM have also been used to profile postoperative patients at risk for VTE (23, 113–116). This background in using TEG/ROTEM to predict a patient’s fibrinolytic phenotype prepares the surgeon to manage CAC patients. Given the significant variation in risk of the development of either a hypocoagulopathic- or hypercoagulopathic-related complication in the perioperative period as a function of the severity of COVID-19 illness, it is difficult to rely on arbitrary standards regarding the timing of surgery and the nature of anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis in this group of patients (17, 28, 29, 31, 108). The recent evolution of the less virulent but more infectious variants, such as the omicron (B.1.1.529), may render guidelines regarding the timing and nature of therapeutic anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis for the surgical patient less applicable. Although there is no data directly demonstrating lower risk of thrombosis in patients infected with omicron versus other more virulent variants, thrombosis risk in COVID-19 patients is in large part a function of illness severity (117, 118). By logical extension of this evidence, it is likely omicron infection carries less thrombotic risk compared to more virulent variants such as alpha or delta. Age, comorbidities, and overall clinical picture are paramount to consider when deciding to what degree the individual patient should be anticoagulated. There are no plasma-based laboratory tests which allow for prediction of the likelihood of perioperative complications regarding coagulation for the surgical patient with either acute or remote COVID-19 infection. Historically, VHAs have been used to predict both bleeding and clotting in patients undergoing liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, trauma surgery, and most recently, bleeding and clotting obstetric patients. Most recently, adjunctive TEG has demonstrated prediction of VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients (20–23). However, categorizing patients’ fibrinolytic and coagulopathic phenotype with TEG/ROTEM, as has been done by surgeons for decades, may allow the surgeon to better predict the development of perioperative clot and to manage pre- and post-surgical clots more effectively in the COVID-19 patient. In addition, platelet activation can be graded with plasma microclot density analysis, which has demonstrated that Long COVID patients have a persistent coagulopathy and increased microclot formation (119). Together, TEG/ROTEM with microclot analysis may predict the surgical patient’s position in the hemostatic and fibrinolysis spectrum in the absence of evidenced biomarkers. Figure 3 illustrates the ‘rollercoaster’ phenomenon of hospitalized COVID-19 patients as characterized by TEG/ROTEM in the acute and subacute periods, as well as the remote period after discharge (77). Figure 4 provides a prototype spectrum of CAC wherein the patient’s individual coagulopathy may be modified by the COVID-19 variant and is characterized by TEG/ROTEM and plasma microclot analysis. Studies are in progress regarding microclot analysis as an enhanced method of hemostatic grading (78). SURGICAL SOCIETIES’ RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE COVID-19 PATIENT’S TIMING OF SURGERY AND THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS Emergency surgery in the acute period of COVID-19 infection requiring hospitalization is associated with high mortality (8, 123). These increases in mortality have been observed across various surgical specialties (123). As a result, there are surgical specialty-specific recommendations regarding the timing of surgery for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. These recommendations are varied and a function of institutional preference and expert consensus. Table 2 and the text below summarizes the literature and recommendations of the leading surgical and obstetric organizations regarding the timing and administration of thromboprophylaxis for patients with acute and remote SARS-CoV-2 infection. Obstetrics Obstetricians have long experience with surgical interventions on patients who have peripartum coagulopathies wherein the patient may switch between hemorrhagic and thrombotic phenotypes rapidly. Obstetricians have similar experience as CAC with pathologies such as preeclampsia, Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome, morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) and other significant diseases associated with the peripartum state (145– 156). This spectrum of disorders in the peripartum patient allow pathophysiological comparison to the hemostatic derangement of CAC in the nonpregnant surgical patient (29, 157). In each disease entity, there is endotheliitis that results in an immuno-thrombotic crosstalk resulting in local thrombosis and/or hemorrhage at the level of the inflamed endothelium (17, 157). For example, prepartum patients with preeclampsia must be given thromboprophylaxis to prevent clotting, but during parturition, they are at higher risk for bleeding, and again return to a hypercoagulable state postpartum (157). In tandem, postpartum patients with preeclampsia or other underlying risk factors for a hypercoagulable state should be treated for at least six weeks with thromboprophylaxis postpartum (146). Hence, discussion of the obstetrical approaches to providing thromboprophylaxis serves as an ideal foundation for describing the other surgical disciplines with more straightforward pathophysiological proclivities for the formation of perioperative clots. International guidelines for thromboprophylaxis for women who have undergone a C-section are heterogeneous in their recommendations regarding the timing and duration of thromboprophylaxis (146, 158). In the United States and other countries, thromboprophylaxis for women undergoing C-sections has been described by the Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 9 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
| The Surgical Technologist | JULY 2022 310 American College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists guidelines that recommend thromboprophylaxis for all patients with Csections who have at least one major indication or two minor indications for anticoagulation (159). The three major indications are previous VTE, body mass index (BMI) > 35, and thrombophilia. The minor indications are preeclampsia, hypertension, diabetes, peripartum infection, and other comorbidities (145, 159–163). Since guidelines are dynamic, the inclusion of COVID-19 as a minor indication seems reasonable. However, it would also be judicious to refer to the spectrum of diseases whereby women with severe COVID-19 are included in the group of patients with major indications for anticoagulation such that they would receive six weeks thromboprophylaxis. This paradigm has been useful in the most recent literature and serves as a template for applications to the other disciplines. Since there is sparse literature regarding the guidance of thromboprophylaxis and treatment of the peripartum COVID19 patient, surgeons must rely on consensus recommendations from interim guidelines. These recommendations for peripartum anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis have been extrapolated from the COVID-19 literature for nonpregnant patients. Interim guidelines have been published by many organizations with specific references to pregnant women (164–166). Orthopaedics Similar to obstetric patients, there is a spectrum of risk for developing postoperative VTE as a function of COVID-19 illness severity in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Significant literature has demonstrated the benefit of serial VHAs to predict postoperative VTE (167–169). Therefore, for a disease which, by its very nature presents with a hypercoagulopathic state manifested clinically by increased VTEs and arterial thromboses, the use of VHAs in this COVID-19 population is a logical extension. While consensus recommendations have been proposed to optimize safety for patients undergoing elective surgery after previously being diagnosed with COVID-19, adjunctive VHAs may enhance these guidelines to better predict VTE and guide anticoagulant therapy postoperatively (131, 170–172). Early intervention tends to be optimal for fracture fixation, but timing of surgery is historically complicated in patients with hemostatic derangement such as that which is induced in the post-COVID-19 patient. Decreased time between hip fracture and surgery correlates with decreased morbidity and mortality. FIGURE 4 | Prototype spectrum of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy used to assess the patient’s coagulopathy with thromboelastography (TEG) and plasma microclot analysis. Shown above is an example of correlation between the most hypercoagulable delta (B.1.617.1) variant, intermediate hypercoagulable omicron (B.1.1.529) variant, and physiologic TEGs with corresponding plasma microclot analyses. Using Thioflavin-T as afluorescent marker specifically for microclot staining, fluorescence microscopy demonstrates microclots in plasma with representative examples of different degrees of microclot formation as related to delta (A), omicron (B), and physiologic (C) TEGs. Previously described, Stage 1 to 4 is a qualitative numerical scoring system where a score of 4 is given for significant and widespread microclot formation and a score of 1 is given for minimal microclot formation (78, 119). In this figure, delta variant (A) equals stage 4, omicron (nonhospitalized patient) (B) is stage 3, normal physiologic non-infected individual (C) is stage 2. A hypocoagulable state either from anticoagulation of the COVID-19 patient or due to naturally acquired disease from COVID-19-associated coagulopathy is stage 1 (not pictured). Patients with Long COVID also demonstrate microclot formation, which may be used to assess platelet dysfunction and surgical candidacy in this group of patients (77, 78, 119). The omicron variant (BA.1 sub-lineage) was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on S-gene target failure (SGTF) as a proxy for variant status (https://www.science.org/doi/ 10.1126/science.abn4543) (120). The TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit® (Thermo Fisher Scientific) identifies SARS-CoV-2 infections by detecting 3 viral gene regions, E, RdRP, and Ngene. The laboratory reported positive cycle threshold of 32 cycles for both the E gene, 35 for RdRP and 34 for the Ngene. Positive N gene with negative S gene (SGTF) is an acceptable proxy of the BA.1 variant when the gold-standard whole genome sequencing is not done. The PCR result combined with reported case counts and known genomic epidemiology of the 4th wave in South Africa has been used to track changes in transmission over time for the BA.1 variant (121, 122). Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 10 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
JULY 2022 | The Surgical Technologist | 315 TABLE 2 | Society recommendations on timing of surgery and thromboprophylaxis in acute and convalescent COVID-19 patients. Note this table is not exhaustive, but reflects the diverse and heterogeneous recommendations regarding the timing of surgery and anticoagulation for this patient population. Discipline Association Recommendations Anesthesia American Society of Anesthesiologists (13) • Timing of elective surgery should be delayed based on the symptoms and severity of acute COVID-19 illness. From time of diagnosis: • Four weeks for an asymptomatic patient or those recovering from mild, nonrespiratory symptoms • Six weeks for a patient with respiratory symptoms who was not hospitalized • Eight to 10 weeks for a symptomatic patient who is immunocompromised, diabetic, or was hospitalized • Twelve weeks for a patient who was admitted to an ICU for COVID-19 complications Obstetrics American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (124) • Surgery may be delayed when a patient’s health would not be harmed. • Thrombosis risk may be increased with COVID-19 infection • Pregnant patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 receive prophylactic dose anticoagulation unless contraindicated American Society for Reproductive Medicine (125) • Procedures should not be delayed if patient health is at risk; triage into four periods of surgery: • Cannot be delayed (e.g., hysteroscopy) • Delay up to four weeks (e.g., colposcopy, LEEP) • Delay four to twelve weeks (e.g., TVUS, vulvar biopsy) • Delay beyond twelve weeks (e.g., Botox) Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (126) • Thromboprophylaxis should still be offered and administered as normally indicated during the COVID-19 pandemic, should be continued if patient contracts COVID-19 • Pregnant women with COVID-19 should be given prophylactic LMWH, unless birth is expected within 12 hours or there is significant risk of hemorrhage • Pregnant women hospitalized with COVID-19 should be offered thromboprophylaxis for 10 days following discharge and longer with thrombophilic co-morbidities • Postpartum patient hospitalized for COVID-19 infection should be offered thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization and for at least 10 days after discharge, and up to 6 weeks of thromboprophylaxis for thrombophilic co-morbidities • Avoid general anesthesia for at least 7 weeks after COVID-19 infection Orthopaedics American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (127) • Reschedule elective surgery for individuals with ongoing COVID-19 • Delay elective surgery based on local capacity to care for COVID-19 patients American Association for Hand Surgery (128) • Delay surgery based on local capacity to care for COVID-19 patients American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (129) • Prioritize surgery based on clinical need American Orthopaedic Association (130) • Delay surgery based on clinical need and institutional resource availability European Hip Society and European Knee Associates (131) • For infected otherwise healthy individuals, delay elective arthroplasty by 6 weeks • For infected patients with one or more co-morbidity, delay surgery by 8 weeks General Surgery American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (132) • Delay surgery based on risk factors, local viral prevalence, and institutional resource availability on an individual basis American Society of General Surgeons (133), American College of Surgeons (134, 135) • Prioritize surgery based on risk factors and patient benefits on an individual basis • Discernment process is streamlined at an institutional level, with final input coming from the surgeon • Defer to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) tiered framework for urgency of procedures based upon Elective Surgery Acuity Scale (ESAS) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) (136) • Three-tiered system to decide whether to postpone surgery based upon two factors: acuity of procedure and the health of the patient • Tier 1, low acuity surgery – postpone (e.g., carpal tunnel release, routine colonoscopy) • Tier 2, intermediate acuity surgery – consider postponing (e.g., arthroplasty, elective angioplasty + stent) • Tier 3, high acuity surgery – do not postpone (e.g., trauma, cancers, neurosurgery) (continued) Bunch et al. COVID-19 Immuno-Thrombosis and Surgery Frontiers in Surgery | www.frontiersin.org 11 2022 | Volume 9 | Article 889999
www.ast.orgRkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTExMDc1